Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 37 — Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights · Part 42 · § 42.73

§ 42.73. Judgment.

364 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t37/s§ 42.73·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)A judgment, except in the case of a termination, disposes of all issues that were, or by motion reasonably could have been, raised and decided.
(b)Request for adverse judgment. A party may request judgment against itself at any time during a proceeding. Actions construed to be a request for adverse judgment include:
(1)Disclaimer of the involved application or patent;
(2)Cancellation or disclaimer of a claim such that the party has no remaining claim in the trial;
(3)Concession of unpatentability or derivation of the contested subject matter; and
(4)Abandonment of the contest.
(c)Recommendation. The judgment may include a recommendation for further action by an examiner or by the Director.
(d)Estoppel.
(1)Petitioner other than in derivation proceeding. A petitioner, or the real party in interest or privy of the petitioner, is estopped in the Office from requesting or maintaining a proceeding with respect to a claim for which it has obtained a final written decision on patentability in an inter partes review, post-grant review, or a covered business method patent review, on any ground that the petitioner raised or reasonably could have raised during the trial, except that estoppel shall not apply to a petitioner, or to the real party in interest or privy of the petitioner who has settled under 35 U.S.C. 317 or 327.
(2)In a derivation, the losing party who could have properly moved for relief on an issue, but did not so move, may not take action in the Office after the judgment that is inconsistent with that party's failure to move, except that a losing party shall not be estopped with respect to any contested subject matter for which that party was awarded a favorable judgment.
(3)Patent applicant or owner. A patent applicant or owner is precluded from taking action inconsistent with the adverse judgment, including obtaining in any patent:
(i)A claim that is not patentably distinct from a finally refused or canceled claim; or
(ii)An amendment of a specification or of a drawing that was denied during the trial proceeding, but this provision does not apply to an application or patent that has a different written description.
Connections8 cite this · traces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 42.73
Judgment.
Fed. Reg.×8
Cites 1Cited by 8 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.